Four-year-old Aria Talathi was found submerged in the swimming pool of a Florida rental home, and at first glance, her death appeared to be a tragic childhood drowning. But according to investigators, preliminary autopsy findings raised questions about whether Aria was already dead before she entered the water. In this episode, Julie examines the case from her perspective as a forensic nurse death investigator, looking at the reported injuries, the questions surrounding the drowning findings, inconsistencies in the timeline, and the investigative process used when the scene appears to tell one story while the body may be telling another.
Sometimes a death scene seems to tell you exactly what happened. A child is found submerged in a swimming pool, and the immediate assumption is drowning.
But as a death investigator, I've learned that where someone is found doesn't necessarily tell us where, or how, they died.
In this episode of Pushing Up Lilies, I'm taking you through the case of four-year-old Aria Talathi, who was found in the deep end of a swimming pool at a short-term rental in Florida while traveling with her mother, Dr. Neha Gupta. What initially appeared to be a devastating childhood drowning became something very different when investigators began looking more closely at the physical evidence.
According to the arrest affidavit discussed in this episode, investigators said Aria's lungs and stomach were considered dry, while the examination also documented cuts inside her mouth and bruising along the insides of her cheeks. Authorities alleged those injuries raised the possibility that she had been smothered and was already dead before being placed in the pool.
I'll take you behind the scenes of how I would approach a death investigation like this, including what I would photograph, what questions I would ask, how I would build the timeline, and why something as simple as a door latch, an undisturbed bed, a phone record, or the contents of a stomach can become important.
And there's something I don't want us to lose in all of the forensic details: Aria was four years old. Before her name appeared in an arrest affidavit or became part of a murder case, she was a little girl who went to the beach, rode jet skis, and traveled with her mother. Her life deserves to remain at the center of this story.
I also begin this episode with a brief update on the Lindsay Clancy case following the September 4 mistrial and what may happen next.
Content Note: This episode discusses the death of a child, possible smothering/asphyxiation, drowning, and alleged homicide.
00:06
Welcome to Pushing Up Lilies. I'm your host, Julie Mattson.
00:10
Pushing Up Lilies is a weekly true crime podcast with spine-tingling, unusual, and terrifyingly true stories from my perspective as a forensic death investigator and a sexual assault nurse examiner.
00:24
Do I have some stories for you? Are you ready? Hey, guys. Welcome back to another episode of Pushing Up Lilies. Guess what? The humidity in Mexico makes my hair wavy. That's new to me.
00:40
I never knew that that happened, but I'm coming at you this week from Costa Mujeres, about 20 miles north of Cancun, and we are at the Majestic Elegance Resort. It's beautiful here.
00:54
It's a five-star resort that we just happened to find on American Airlines'... what is it? American Airlines Vacations. And so, we leave tomorrow, which I hate, because it's been kinda nice.
01:06
Super warm and humid today, but this place has amazing food, and so we've loved our stay here. You might hear some random noises during my recording.
01:16
For some reason, it sounds like there's a herd of elephants upstairs, so I don't know what's going on up there.
01:21
But wanted to remind you of a few things before I start talking about this week's episode.
01:27
First of all, don't forget October 10th is gonna be our second annual Murder Mystery Dinner at Studio 141 in Crump. It's going to be so much fun. It's gonna be a blast for everybody.
01:41
You know, there are gonna be a lot of true crime lovers there, so you're gonna have a lot in common with the people who are attending.
01:47
Jan Bynum is gonna be our guest speaker, and her daughter was Kelly Anne Cox, the UNT student that was abducted and murdered back in 1997.
01:58
And then catered by Our Blended Table, who has delicious food. And so, it's goanna be right next door to The Merc in Crump, and then we will have merchandise available there. Some new stuff.
02:10
I got some really new stuff that y'all are gonna absolutely love. October 24th is gonna be the Day of the Dead Festival in Downtown Denton. Again, I'm not racing this year.
02:20
I'm just gonna have a vendor table but have some super cute Day of the Dead stickers that I had made for that event. So y'all are gonna love that.
02:29
And then in the end of November, I'll be at the Texas EMS Conference, where I will be giving advice to EMS and firefighters on how to preserve scenes when forensics is involved.
02:42
I know us death investigators talk about that all the time, how we need to educate first responders on forensics in general and how to preserve evidence, even though saving the life is definitely the most important thing.
02:57
But there are also some things to just take into account whenever you are at the hospital, in the ER, seeing a patient who has been shot or has been in an accident, what to do, what not to do type stuff, just to be helpful, just so that we can all be cohesive on our investigation, because there may or may not be an investigation following a patient being transported by EMS or being seen in the emergency room.
03:27
Just things to kinda help so we can all work together. And then I'm still trying to decide on the Crime Cruise. I haven't really decided on that yet. I don't know.
03:36
But I am still really looking forward to Crime Con in Florida, in Orlando, in September of 2027.
03:45
So, a lot of stuff going on, and I'm trying to get better about thinking ahead in advance, but I do wanna thank y'all.
03:53
I've been getting a lot of orders from my merch store and a lot of orders for the cereal box.
04:01
I love how people are ordering the Serial box for their loved ones for gifts, like for birthdays and stuff, and it's great.
04:08
And I know in the last one I put, as kind of a little special memento, I did sign a comic book and put it in there, so it was kind of this little extra bonus to show them how much I appreciate the order.
04:19
The cereal boxes are fun. If y'all have not looked into those, you definitely should. If you have a friend or a loved one who loves true crime, a cereal box is a great gift.
04:29
It's something they're not gonna get anywhere else.
04:31
It's a box full of stuff that true crime lovers will absolutely love, and I can't think of another, like, unusual gift that would be better for someone that you know loves true crime.
04:46
I will have a special Valentine's Day cereal box edition that I'm also looking forward to rolling out. And so, you can order for holidays on my website.
04:57
So, you'll notice when you go up to where you can order the Serial boxes, that you can order one that's themed for Christmas or themed for Valentine's Day or themed for different things.
05:08
So be sure and do that. But if you want just a random box of cute true crime memorabilia, just place an order.
05:17
Even get one for yourself, get one for a friend, but really consider that for a gift, 'cause it's a great idea and it's so different.
05:24
I love that it's a little bit different and something that you can give somebody that you know no one else is gonna give them.
05:30
This week, before we get into today's case, I wanna give you a little quick update on where things stand in the Lindsay Clancy case. I know everyone's been following that.
05:41
On September 4th, the judge declared a mistrial after the jury said that it was unable to reach a unanimous verdict.
05:49
So, the jury had deliberated for seven days, and the central question is whether Lindsay was criminally responsible when she killed her kids.
06:01
So, Her defense argued, of course, that she was not criminally responsible, that she had this history of postpartum psychosis, that she had seen multiple doctors and had been taking multiple different prescriptions.
06:16
Prosecutors, on the other hand, argued that her actions showed planning and that she did understand right from wrong.
06:25
So, the defense had asked the judge to remove a juror after reporting concerns about whether the juror was actually following the court's instructions, and the judge actually denied that request.
06:39
And so, Massachusetts highest court also declined to intervene before the mistrial became final. So where does this leave the case, as everyone's wondering? There is no conviction.
06:53
There is no acquittal. Lindsay remains in custody under psychiatric care at Tewksbury State Hospital. Now, prosecutors still have the option to try this case again.
07:05
There is a court hearing scheduled for September twenty-ninth, and we expect at that time to learn more about whether the Commonwealth will pursue a second trial or another resolution.
07:21
It's kind of interesting the way it's all gone down. I know everybody is on pins and needles.
07:26
I'll continue to follow every filing and every hearing, and once we know the prosecution's next move, I will bring you another update. It's a hurry up and wait.
07:39
So, September twenty-ninth, we still have about three weeks looking at the calendar until the next hearing. Hopefully, we will know then a little more about what's gonna happen with Lindsay Clancy.
07:53
There are a lot of people talking about this case, and there's a lot of splits on how people feel about it. So, I'm kind of interested to see how it turns out.
08:03
Wanted to talk a little bit about another case this week, and it's similar, but not really.
08:09
I mean, there are scenes that tell you exactly what happened, and then there are scenes that seem to tell you one thing while the body tells you something completely different.
08:20
It's not always obvious. So, let's talk about this case. On June twenty-seventh, and this was back in twenty twenty-five, not this year, four-year-old Aria Talathi was found submerged.
08:33
So, she was in the deep end of a swimming pool at a short-term rental in El Portal, Florida, and her mother had taken her there. Her mother was a pediatrician from Oklahoma named Dr.
08:47
Neha Gupta, and she told investigators that she believed that her daughter had drowned.
08:55
And according to the arrest affidavit, the preliminary autopsy findings didn't really support straightforward drowning.
09:05
Investigators said that there was no water in her lungs or her stomach at the time of autopsy, and they also said that there were cuts inside of her mouth, and there was also bruising inside of her cheeks.
09:20
Now, those are things that we look at as investigators at a scene. We look inside the mouth. We look everywhere. We look at the eyes to see if there were any signs of strangulation like petechiae.
09:34
So, these are things that we do look at at the scene. Many times, if we find something, we'll photograph at the scene.
09:42
Those injuries obviously raised a very different question, wanting to know, was this little girl already dead before she entered the water?
09:53
Today, I want to kind of walk you through what authorities allege happened to Aria, and then I'm gonna take you kind of behind the scenes from my perspective as a forensic nurse death investigator.
10:05
I want to kind of explain why injuries inside the mouth can matter, what smothering might look like at autopsy, and why a body found in water isn't necessarily a drowning.
10:19
And then also just exactly how I would approach a scene like this. It's interesting for people to see, like, what we would do as investigators.
10:28
Now, this, I want to say, remains an active criminal case. The allegations have not been proven to a jury.
10:36
I'm just gonna separate reported facts from allegations and forensic interpretation throughout this episode. And y'all know I'm all about the facts.
10:45
Every once in a while, I might put in my two cents, but I think one thing is I can remain unbiased. I think I talked about that last week.
10:53
I don't always form an opinion, and not many people can be that way, but I was the same way when I was a sexual assault nurse.
11:03
I don't try to decide myself what kind of punishment someone could get because I understand that my thoughts are not really gonna matter. If I'm not on the jury, my two cents don't matter.
11:16
But I have also been really good about, like, remaining completely unbiased and just letting the cards fall as they may.
11:25
But I like to add information about my job, what I would do, and how I would handle certain situations in, like, death investigation cases.
11:35
That's kind of what makes my podcast a little bit different. So, Aria Talathi was four years old back in June of twenty twenty-five.
11:44
She traveled from Oklahoma to South Florida with her mother, who was Dr. Gupta.
11:49
Now, Gupta was a pediatrician, and she was associated with the University of Oklahoma and OU Health before this trip to Florida with her mom. So, she went from Oklahoma to Florida.
12:02
Mother and daughter stayed in a rental home in El Portal, which is just a small community in Miami-Dade County.
12:09
Now, according to investigators, surveillance indicated that they were the only two people staying there. No one else went with her. No one else came to the home during their stay there.
12:21
They were the only two people there So Aria's father, Dr. Talathi, shared custody of her with Gupta, and he reportedly told detectives that he did not know that Gupta had taken Aria out of Oklahoma.
12:36
So, he had no idea that she was in Florida. Court records and the arrest affidavit actually described an ongoing custody dispute between parents. We know this happens frequently.
12:49
Many times, one parent will take the child out of the country, out of the state. But a custody dispute, that's just context. It doesn't prove motive, and it's not proof of murder.
13:01
Investigators would still document it, though, because it does help establish relationships. Where was the relationship? Where did it stand at the time this happened?
13:11
Recent conflict between her and her husband. Authority to travel, did she have permission to leave Oklahoma and go to Florida?
13:19
Any communications that she had with anybody regarding her trip, did anyone know she was going? And then the decisions made before the death.
13:30
Gupta told investigators that she and Aria spent the day at the beach, and they rode jet skis, and then they returned to their rental during the evening.
13:41
Now, Aria was reportedly tired and asleep when they got there. Gupta said that she woke her up, and it was around nine o'clock for dinner.
13:52
Then later they went to sleep in the same bed at around twelve thirty in the morning. So that's kind of the story that she's telling.
14:01
Now, according to her, she woke up at about three twenty in the morning after hearing an unidentified noise, and Aria was not in bed.
14:12
She noticed that there was a sliding glass door that led to the backyard, and it was open. She said that she had locked the doors before they went to sleep.
14:24
She said that she went outside, she saw Aria submerged in the pool, and she was in the deep end. Now, this is what's weird.
14:34
The whole thing is weird, but she said that she couldn't swim, and so she spent about ten minutes trying to reach her or assist her before calling nine one one.
14:46
Now, I don't know how deep the deep end is, and I don't know how tall Dr.
14:51
Gupta was, but if you saw your child floating, would you not at least try to, like, jump in, maybe hold onto the edge and try to grab their hand or something?
15:03
So, I'm not really sure, but I am pretty sure that she did not get in the water at all, which is super odd.
15:10
Like, I'm not a good swimmer, but I can guarantee you, if I saw my child or my granddaughter or anybody's child or anybody, I don't even care if it's a child, I'm gonna make an attempt.
15:23
I will be wet from trying to help them. We're not talking about the ocean. It's a pool. Now, again, I don't know how deep it was on the deep end but make an attempt, you know.
15:34
Like, at least jump in. You can hold on to the side. I don't know. I don't know. I wasn't there. But police and fire rescue responded at about three forty in the morning.
15:47
First responders actually had to remove Aria from the pool, and they began resuscitation. She was taken to Jackson Memorial Hospital, and she was pronounced dead at four twenty-eight AM.
16:01
Now, at first glance, anybody would think this sounds like a devastating childhood drowning.
16:08
This sounds like this child went out the back door, unlocked it first, went out the back door, got into the pool for whatever reason, and drowned, and got out of bed, opened the door, slips into the water while moms asleep.
16:24
And those deaths happen. They happen a lot. And that possibility does deserve a fair investigation. But an investigator never stops at the first story that fits that location.
16:39
The swimming pool is where Aria was found, but it doesn't automatically establish where or how she died.
16:47
So, the Miami-Dade medical examiner performed an autopsy on June twenty-ninth, and according to the arrest affidavit, the medical examiner reported that her lungs and her stomach were actually considered dry.
17:04
So, investigators said that the medical examiner actually ruled out drowning and believed that Aria was dead before she was placed in the pool.
17:15
The examination also documented cuts inside her mouth and bruises on the insides of her cheeks.
17:23
Now, authorities said that those injuries did not fit the resuscitation that she received and appeared consistent with maybe asphyxiation by smothering.
17:35
So, these are not injuries caused by resuscitation. You know, they have to put an ET tube down when they are doing CPR, and it wouldn't be abnormal to have maybe a broken tube or something like that.
17:51
But they are saying that she shouldn't have bruising in the sides of her cheeks. Now, a third detail concerned her stomach content.
18:00
Gupta said that they ate dinner at around nine o'clock, but the affidavit says that on autopsy her stomach was empty. It's another inconsistency in the timeline completely.
18:14
I wanna slow down here because news reports tend to turn an autopsy into just one dramatic sentence. Real forensic interpretation really doesn't work that way.
18:23
So, no water in the lungs does not by itself prove that a person did not drown.
18:31
There is some medical literature that recognizes fatal drowning cases with little or no aspirated water, so let's come to that agreement.
18:40
Now, drowning also has no single autopsy finding that proves that diagnosis in every case. A forensic pathologist actually studies the entire picture, and so that's why we take photos at the scene.
18:54
The picture includes the scene, the lung findings, the airway material, stomach and sinus contents, as well as toxicology and injuries.
19:06
And you've gotta take into account witness statements and resuscitation and alternative causes of death.
19:14
The mouth injuries do not prove smothering on their own either, so their importance comes from their location and the pattern and the age and how do they look microscopically and how do they relate to every other finding.
19:29
So, if the reported injuries were produced before death, they did not match CPR or airway management, and they would carry a lot more weight. This is the part that people miss.
19:45
Forensic findings gain meaning through correlation.
19:49
Sometimes one finding might give you a question, and several independent findings actually pointing in the same direction will give you more of a conclusion as far as what happened.
20:01
Smothering actually means blocking the external airway, so usually the nose and the mouth.
20:08
And we all know you can smother someone with your hand or a pillow or bedding or clothing or any kind of other soft object.
20:19
The obstruction prevents normal air exchange, so your oxygen levels are gonna fall, your carbon dioxide level is gonna rise, and if the obstruction continues, the person is gonna eventually lose consciousness and die from hypoxia.
20:36
And that's just kinda how it works in a nutshell. Smothering is one of the harder forms of asphyxia to prove. A soft object might leave very little visible injury on the outside of the face.
20:49
And petechiae, facial congestion, and cyanosis, which is like the blue discoloration of the skin, are sometimes present, but they're not specific to smothering.
21:01
So, their absence does not exclude it, and their presence does not prove it. So, it's hard. It's hard when you're looking into cases like this when it's not completely obvious.
21:13
Now, the inside of the mouth might hold the more useful evidence. Think about the anatomy. So, the lips and cheeks are soft tissue sitting directly against the teeth and the gums.
21:26
And if someone presses firmly over a child's mouth, the lips and inner cheeks might get crushed between the inside force and then the teeth inside.
21:36
So that pressure can produce bruising of the inner lips or the buccal mucosa, which is that lining inside the cheek.
21:46
So, it might create abrasions or even small lacerations or tears near the frenulum, which is that little piece of skin that is between your lip and the top of your mouth, or maybe a hemorrhage where that tissue was in contact with a tooth.
22:05
Also, fingernails might leave scratches around the nose or mouth.
22:09
So, a hand used to control the head could leave bruises along the cheeks if someone's holding someone like this or the neck, shoulders, even the back of the head if they're pushing, like, down on somebody.
22:23
So, in a small child, the force required to obstruct the nose, and mouth is different from the force needed to restrain an adult.
22:32
So, we know a four-year-old is gonna have less strength, less body mass, and less ability to escape. So that might mean that there are fewer defensive injuries.
22:43
But it might also mean that subtle injuries are really important in cases like this. So, if I were looking at photographs from an autopsy, I would want more detail than just cuts in the mouth.
22:57
I would wanna know, like, where were they, upper lip, lower lip, and I'm sure that's all documented on the body diagram in the autopsy. Right cheek, left cheek. Were they opposite particular teeth?
23:11
Were they linear? Were they irregular? Were they patterned? Was there any swelling? Was there any hemorrhaging? Did the pathologist reflect the lip and photograph the entire oral cavity?
23:22
Sometimes you gotta pull the lip all the way up, all the way down, get all the pictures, get good pictures of the inside of the jaw. Was the frenulum intact?
23:32
Were the gums, tongue, palate, and throat examined? I'm sure they were, especially because they noticed those bruises. I'm sure that the autopsy included very particular photographs.
23:44
So, I would also ask if they did microscopy that actually got a good up close. So, did the tissue respond while the blood was circulating?
23:56
Hemorrhage infiltrating the tissue and an early inflammatory response might actually support an injury that occurred when she was alive.
24:06
Now, postmortem handling might damage the tissue, but it usually doesn't really produce the same biological response as an injury that occurred when someone's living.
24:15
So, I would also compare the injuries in the mouth with the resuscitation record. Did anybody insert the oral airway? Was she intubated? How many attempts did they make?
24:27
Was it a difficult intubation?
24:29
And many times, EMS as hospital staff would tell us that, you know, we had to attempt intubation two or three times, or we broke a tooth during our intubation attempt, which is not abnormal.
24:42
With suction use, sometimes that can cause pressure on the inner jaw. Did the laryngoscope or the tube come in contact with the lips or the gums or the tongue or the throat?
24:55
Did they force opening of the jaw?
24:58
Many times, I've seen people try to intubate somebody that's already in rigor, and so it's obviously not gonna work, but the jaw is stiff, and you have to force it open.
25:10
Did the medical team document any oral trauma before or after treatment? That is also super important.
25:18
CPR itself really focuses on chest compressions and ventilation, but it doesn't usually explain bruising deep within your cheeks.
25:27
Airway instruments, like I said, can cause some mouth injuries, and so that's why timing and location matter. So, I would obtain every emergency medical record.
25:36
I would speak with the EMS workers that responded, and that's important, and that's something that we never wanna overlook as an investigator because they can really give us first-hand what happened.
25:48
And don't have someone that's on duty that day read the old record. Have the people that were there that day. If you have to wait for them to come back on shift, I would do that.
25:58
I made myself notes sometimes. I need to talk to this paramedic. What day are they back? Fine, I'll call back and talk to them.
26:06
Or if you agree with me that this is urgent, give me their phone number or have them call me so that I can talk to them about this case. That's important.
26:14
I don't want someone to read the record to me. I have the record. I need the person that performed this procedure, and I need to make sure that they documented everything.
26:26
It's so important, so important, especially in cases like this.
26:30
I would never look at a bruise inside the mouth and say, "This is smothering." You know, I would say, "I need an explanation of this injury," and then I would test every reasonable explanation against the evidence that I had.
26:44
So, something else that's very important is talking about the pool. There's a major forensic difference between drowning and postmortem immersion.
26:55
Now, drowning is a process, and that's caused by respiratory impairment because someone's underwater, right? They can't breathe. They're put into a liquid, and they're unable to take a breath.
27:06
Now, the person is alive when the airway goes beneath the water in that case, in drownings. Postmortem immersion means the person died from another cause and then entered the water afterward.
27:22
Now, a person who breathes while they're submerged obviously is gonna aspirate water, and so at autopsy, the lungs might be heavy or overexpanded or just full of water.
27:33
And the lungs are weighed, and they are looked at closely. Now, the airway can also contain foam.
27:41
Fluid might appear in the stomach because the person swallowed water during their struggle, and water might also enter the sinuses. And so, none of those findings are perfectly specific.
27:54
Resuscitation, decomposition, disease, and the time between recovery and examination kinda all affect what the pathologist sees at autopsy.
28:05
Now, skin changes such as wrinkling of the hands, which I've had this entire trip because I've been in the water, they tell you that the body was exposed to water, but they don't prove that the person inhaled water while they were alive.
28:19
The same is true of wet clothing, obviously. A body placed in a pool after death will still become eventually wet and develop immersion changes.
28:29
But the absence of water in both lungs and the stomach would make me look very hard at the possibility of postpartum immersion, where someone's put in the water after they were dead.
28:41
It becomes more concerning if another lethal process is present, like injuries consistent with smothering.
28:48
But still, I would want the final autopsy report and not just a summary from this court affidavit. I would want the weight of the lungs. I would want histology.
28:58
I would want imaging, airway findings, toxicology, details of the resuscitation, and then exactly what the pathologist's reasoning was. I would also look at the pool itself.
29:12
Again, I mentioned how deep was the water. She was on the deep end. How deep was it? Could she stand anywhere in it? Was there a shallow ledge or a step? Was the water clear? Were the lights on?
29:27
The pool gate doesn't really matter because she obviously had gone out the back door, and so we don't really know if that was secure or not, but could someone have come in the pool gate? Who knows?
29:40
But how difficult was the sliding door to open? Is that something that she could have done easily? Could she have actually reached the lock and operated the lock? Were there any alarms on the door?
29:54
Were there any wet footprints leading from the bedroom or anywhere around the pool? Which is a very good question. Were towels, bathing suits, toys, or flotation devices anywhere nearby?
30:08
Now, the waterline on the body and clothing might also matter. So would debris, hair, fibers, or transfer evidence.
30:17
Investigators would document the pool temperature as well, any chemical treatment, the weather, visibility, recovery conditions. They might also get water samples for comparison.
30:31
When a pathologist believes specialized testing is appropriate, though no single water-based test is gonna settle the diagnosis.
30:40
So, the question isn't simply was she found in water, because we know that that's what happened. The question is, was she alive and breathing when she got into the water?
30:51
So, if I were called to investigate this death, my work would begin before I ever touched the body. The autopsy actually starts at the scene by the investigator.
31:03
If the scene information is incomplete or distorted, then that just means the pathologist receives an incomplete story, and that's not fair.
31:12
That's not fair to the decedent, and it's not fair to the other surviving family members. Now, first, I would establish what changed before my arrival. That's super important. Who found her?
31:25
Who entered the backyard? Who took her out of the water? Where was she placed? Who performed CPR? What equipment touched her face or mouth? Were her clothes removed? Did anyone move furniture?
31:38
Were there any doors opened or closed? Did anyone pick up a towel? Did anyone clean water up off the floor? It's really nice and polite to pick up a towel and say, "Oh, there's water on the floor.
31:49
Wipe it up." It's also important to tell someone if you are a first responder and you did that because that's one of the clues that they look for in the investigation.
31:59
So, every single life-saving action matters, and none of it is criticism. So, I need to be able, though, to separate medical intervention from evidence of the original event.
32:12
Second, I would photograph the entire property. Before focusing on the pool, I'd start outside and kinda work inward.
32:18
I'd get a street view, the front entrance, every access point, the bedroom, the bed, the sliding door, the route to the pool, the pool from all four sides, the deep ends, the steps, the lighting, the locks, the fence, the distance between the bed and the water.
32:39
How far would she have had to travel? I'd photograph doors and locks in their found position and then test them after documentation with law enforcement and approval.
32:51
But I would measure the height of each latch and then determine whether or not a child of her height could reach it.
32:58
And then I would check whether the door moves smoothly, whether it self-closed, if there were any alarms. And third, I'd document the bedroom. Was one side of the bed even disturbed?
33:09
Is there any indication that Aria was asleep on one side of the bed at any point? Were there impressions or bedding patterns suggesting that there were two people asleep there? Was there any vomit?
33:21
Was there any blood, saliva, urine, anything? Were pillows or blankets missing? Did any pillowcase appear damp or out of place?
33:32
I would avoid interpreting those details until laboratory testing and witness information were available, but they are important. They're important to note at the scene.
33:40
And now fourth, I'd document the body and every medical alteration. Even after resuscitation and transport, I would photograph clothing, hair, hands, fingernails, face, lips, any visible injuries.
33:55
I would note how wet she was, the temperature, lividity, rigor, anything attached by medical personnel.
34:02
And if possible, I would obtain photographs taken by the officers who first responded at the scene before the body was ever moved. And I was able to get those a lot.
34:13
I had the experience of working with some great police departments, and they were all always more than willing to give me copies of their photos because they did realize that those were things that were important.
34:26
And sometimes things have to be moved, you know. When medical intervention is needed, things have to be moved. But again, it's important to let investigators know when that happens.
34:36
Now, fifth, I would build a minute-by-minute timeline. When was Aria last independent and alive? When did a camera capture her? When did phones move or unlock? And when did lights come on?
34:52
When was the nine one one call placed? How long did the call last? And again, make note of when the police got there. And then I would compare the mother's account with the timestamps.
35:03
Digital evidence would matter in a case like this.
35:07
Phones, security cameras, doorbell systems, pool alarms, Wi-Fi connection, search histories, text messages, photographs, anything that can give us a timeline.
35:18
And investigators would preserve those records quickly because we wouldn't want some systems to override that data. And sixth, I would conduct careful, separate interviews.
35:29
I'd ask Gupta, "Take me through the evening," without interrupting her, and then I would return to specific details. What did Aria eat? Who prepared it? Where was the plate? What was she wearing?
35:41
Did she bathe? Was she afraid of water? Would she have even jumped in without her mom there? Could she swim? Had she ever opened the sliding door? What was the noise she heard?
35:53
What did it sound like? Which direction did Gupta look first? Why did she believe she spent ten minutes attempting a rescue? And what did she use to reach the child, if anything?
36:07
The goal wouldn't really be to trap her with a minor mistake, but trauma is gonna disrupt her memory.
36:13
The goal would be to distinguish understandable uncertainty from contradictions involving these physical facts. Interviews are important.
36:23
I would interview the father, any relatives, neighbors, the rental manager, the jet ski operator, anyone who communicated with Gupta that day to see what her interaction was with Aria.
36:36
I would obtain Arya's pediatric records, developmental abilities, recent illnesses, medications, and I would also review the custody orders and any travel communications without treating family conflict as automatic proof of crime.
36:52
But finally, I'd preserve competing explanations, accidental drowning, medical collapse followed by immersion, toxic exposure, smothering followed by staging, another person's involvement if access evidence supported it.
37:09
A good investigator doesn't select a theory and force every fact into it.
37:14
I've seen people do that before, and they automatically reach a conclusion, and then they kind of force every fact to match their conclusion.
37:26
I would list what each theory predicts and then look at the evidence that supports or contradicts each one.
37:33
At autopsy, I would make sure that the pathologist had the scene photographs, which they always should.
37:40
It should have a timeline, EMS records, and specific investigative questions before they begin.
37:46
And that's one reason why, as investigators, we would always request those records and send them with the body or at least email them after the fact.
37:55
The pathologist and the investigator work independently, but they need the same complete factual foundation.
38:02
They would do a full external examination with scaled photographs of every injury, and they would reflect on the lips and the inner cheeks, gums, tongue, nose, and throat and document all those.
38:16
And they would take samples of those suspicious areas for histology.
38:22
And they would do a layered neck examination, and that would be looking for, like, soft tissue and muscle hemorrhaging, injury around the hyoid, evidence of any neck compression.
38:35
Smothering doesn't require strangulation, but offenders sometimes use more than one method of restraint. They might hold them down by their neck and then put something over their mouth.
38:45
So, I would definitely document the eyes and the eyelids for petechiae, those little red dots. And remember also, though, that they are not specific.
38:53
But I would look at the face and the scalp for any subtle bruising and the arms, wrists, and shoulders, even the torso and the legs for restraint or defensive injuries.
39:04
And then fingernail evidence is important in a case like this. If someone tried to defend themselves, they would have, you know, fingernail tissue or blood maybe even under the fingernails.
39:15
Look at the clothing, the mouth area, just everything. For the drowning question, you know, of course, they would weigh the lungs, and they would give descriptions.
39:23
They would look at the airway, document foam or fluid, stomach contents, sinus findings. So, there's a lot that goes into the cause and manner of death.
39:33
They would do probably comprehensive toxicology to look for any medications or sedatives or any substance that might explain why she was incapacitated before her death.
39:47
And injuries, like I said, resulting from CPR, suction, transport, any hospital treatment, medical intervention's gonna leave evidence, so you have to kinda map that against the timeline, so it's not mistaken for part of the death.
40:01
Then comes the hardest part. We have to wait. We have to wait for toxicology and histology and digital evidence and records. But family wants answers immediately. Detectives want direction.
40:15
And the public actually wants a headline. A careful death investigation moves at the speed of reliable information. Now, detectives arrested Dr.
40:25
Gupta in Oklahoma on July first of twenty twenty-five. The original arrest alleged first-degree murder. So, after extradition to Florida, the formal charges actually changed.
40:37
Prosecutors briefly filed aggravated manslaughter and then filed second-degree murder and dropped that manslaughter count. Now, Gupta pleaded not guilty.
40:47
Her attorneys say that Arya's death was just a tragic accident and accused authorities of rushing to judgment, as her attorneys would, and they've challenged the strength and completeness of the medical evidence.
41:02
Now, as of August twenty twenty-six, last month, Gupta remained in the Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center in Miami-Dade County, awaiting trial on the second-degree murder charge.
41:15
Now, a conviction has not yet been entered. The prosecution will need to show far more than an unusual autopsy.
41:23
It's gonna need to connect the injuries, the cause of death, the scene timeline, and Gupta's actions into a coherent case beyond a reasonable doubt.
41:34
The defense will focus on other explanations, the limits of drowning pathology, possible resuscitation injuries, and then any gaps, of course, in the investigation they will find.
41:46
For me, the central forensic questions are clear. Were the oral injuries inflicted while Arya was alive? Do they match any kind of forceful obstruction of her nose and mouth?
42:00
And is there a credible medical or resuscitative explanation? Was she alive when she entered the pool?
42:07
And does the physical evidence match the account given by the only other person known in the home?
42:14
Now, Arya was only four years old, so before her name became part of an arrest affidavit and a murder charge, she was a little girl. She went to the beach. She rode jet skis.
42:26
She traveled with her mother. So, her life deserves to remain the center of this story. And this case also kinda shows you why death investigators resist the obvious answer.
42:38
A body in the pool suggests drowning. A bedroom suggests sleep. And a locked door suggests security, but none of those impressions is a conclusion.
42:50
When I walked into a death scene, I learned to ask three separate questions. What am I being told? What do I see? And do those things agree?
42:59
So, if they do not agree, I don't fill the gap with an assumption. I document everything, preserve it, and bring it to the pathologist, and then they follow the evidence wherever it leads.
43:11
The injuries inside Aria's mouth matter because they might record pressure applied while she was alive.
43:19
The lack of expected drowning findings also matter because it challenges the location of the actual death.
43:27
The empty stomach matters because it might challenge the timeline, and each finding has limitations, but together they formed the basis of the state's allegations that this was a staged drowning.
43:40
Now, a courtroom is gonna decide whether prosecutors have proved that allegation, but until then, Dr. Gupta remains presumed innocent.
43:49
What I hope you take away from this episode is that finding a person in the water is just the beginning of a drowning investigation. It's never the end of one.
43:59
So that's why investigators' jobs are so important, so important that all of those things are done. And so hopefully that kinda helped y'all see, as an investigator, how we put the picture together.
44:14
So again, do not forget to follow me on your favorite podcast platform, and take a look at my website, take a look at my murder merch store, and definitely consider that cereal box.
44:25
And also, don't forget to order your tickets for the second annual Murder Mystery Dinner. Take care, y'all. Bye. Thank you so much for joining me today on Pushing Up Lilies.
44:37
If you like this podcast and would like to share with others, please do me a quick favor and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. This helps to make the podcast more visible to the public.
44:47
Thanks again for spending your time with me and be sure to visit me at pushinguplilies.com for merchandise and past episodes.